REVIEW: The Walking Dead: Season One
"When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth..." a wise gentleman in a film once said. And when there's no more room on the silver screen for the oversaturated zombie genre, the dead will begin to shamble across cable television every Sunday night.
AMC's The Walking Dead is all the rage for some reason, and I'll be damned if I can come up with a good one except maybe it possesses the novelty of displaying a fairly high amount of gore and graphic violence -a staple of all zombie classics- on network tv.
When I heard this show was being developed by AMC I was pretty intrigued. I knew it was based upon a popular series of comics, and while I hadn't read them I am a self-professed comic geek. Add to this a fondness for good zombie movies and, suffice it to say, I was at least a little curious. Could this show live up to the standard set for it by the masters like Argento, or Fulcci? Furthermore, could it add anything new to a genre that even it's godfather George Romero seems to have beaten into the ground like a putrid corpse?
The answer? In a word...nope.
I know there are alot of people who've never seen an actual zombie film that probably think this show is the shit. There are also countless fanboys who would doubtlessly love to swarm me like an undead horde and rip me limb from limb for daring to criticize it. To all of the above I say this: EAT A DICK.
It's really not embarrassingly awful. Nor do I think it's a disaster beyond salvaging but to be truthful about it The Walking Dead -at least season one- is just kinda lame.
I'll give the show it's due first. I am pleasantly suprised with the amount of gore the network has allowed. And the show sets itself up to be really fucking hardcore in it's opening episode. I mean how could I not get excited watching the lead character shoot a 6 year old zombie girl right through the head in the first five minutes of the pilot? (I'm really not trying to be ironic about that. It was pretty awesome.) That let's you know you're entering a world of shit. There's also a badass guest appearance by Michael Rooker as a beligerent, white-trash-racist-asshole (kinda redundant I know) in the second episode. Rooker's performance is so head and shoulders above the acting that takes place during the rest of the first season that to say he pulled off the Ironside Agenda would be an embarassing overstatement. It would also imply the presence of other actors around him. And therein lies the real problem with the show to this point.
The central character is played by some British dickhead who apparently practiced his southern accent while studying Jeff fucking Foxworthy or watching Young Guns I and II. And the rest of the cast looks as if the bulk of their experience came in bit parts for dish detergent commercials. Note to AMC: if you're gonna make a show about a zombie apocalypse, YOU MIGHT WANNA HIRE ACTORS WHO ARE ACTUALLY ALIVE TO PLAY THE LIVING!
With that out of the way let me also complain about the "LOST-esque" nature of the story and it's progression. People basically just run back and forth between two locations with alot of whining and the occasional zombie confrontation thrown in. Wowee! What fun! I have always wanted to see a cluster of bitchy, confused people run to and fro between Atlanta and it's rural suburbs!
If that doesn't reek enough of LOST to you then there's the whole "woman torn between two lovers" thing. Jeezus. I guess this is AMC's strategy to get chicks in on the deal. Note #2 to AMC: YOU CAN'T TURN THE ZOMBIE HOLOCAUST INTO FUCKING LEGENDS OF THE FALL! This transgression is made all the worse by the fact that the woman in question has all the charisma of a sock puppet.
The season ends -lamely- with the survivors finding some kind of underground disease control center reminiscent of the hatch in -yep- LOST. It even comes complete with a cynical curmudgeon who despairs of life and wonders if going through the motions of his existence serves any purpose at all. Yeah that part sounds kinda familiar too doesn't it? In fact if LOST hadn't turned out to be a hideous six season-long joke I'd say J.J. Abrams and those other two assholes were owed a check.
I know I've been pretty rough on the show here. But hey, tearing other people and their efforts down makes me feel better about my life. And like I said earlier, I don't think it's a completely failed experiment. I'm sure AMC will spend more money for the next season, which hopefully means more locations, more interesting characters, and more Michael Rooker. In the meantime you can sate yourself with reruns of a season that was just...meh.
I'm not even gonna bless/burden it with any Hamlins. Instead I've chosen a more appropriate symbol for my feelings on the show's initial season: one confused looking "Bub" from George Romero's Day of the Dead.
Take it or leave it.
Hamlin Grade: one Bub
![]()
Everything you ever loved will be sodomized by Michael Bay,
Joey














Comments
Fuck zombie movies.
There, I said it. And once again for those who weren't paying attention.
Fuck zombie movies.
Joey's right in saying that a zombie-based TV series was the natural progression of the tired genre. To be honest, were it not for the fact these movies are so fucking cheap to make (paint a man grey, have him stumble forwards and moan a bit, tear clothes a bit then... action!) the genre would have collapsed in on itself way before now.
There are only so many aspects that can be used to fill a film. Guys shooting zombies. Zombies biting humans. Humans, recently bitten, facing their mortality. Apocalypse and the poorly-scripted consequences thereof. The scene where everyone hides in a basement while the dumb zombies try to break in. And lots of scenes, framed in smoke, of slow stupid zombies walking down the street.
It's like a jigsaw puzzle. Round up some b-movie actors, loosely frame a script, then ranomly insert the above pieces, in any order at all, until your 87 minutes are filled, then end on a cliffhanger, possibly with Johnny Cash's music playing over the credits.
And if you can't afford that, give Adrien Brody a call.
Fuck I'm bored of zombie movies. The only interesting ones are those which 'reinvent' or 'reinvigorate' the genre. And in the last 10 years there's only been 2 of those... Shawn Of The Dead because it was English and funny. And 28 Days Later, because it had fast zombies instead of slow ones. That is all.
Fuck it, I'm even boring myself with this rant. I'm off to watch Small Seaside Resort Of The Damned to cheer myself up, possibly followed by a double helping of Bouncy Castle Of The Dead. Ciao.
Posted by: Part-time Ninja | December 6, 2010 10:32 AM
dude you're being veeery un-dude.
28 Days Later Sucked. The Dawn of the Dead remake was much better.
but yeah this genre needs a long break.
Posted by: Joey | December 6, 2010 01:02 PM
He's just pissed because the only difference between a zombie and a Brit, is perfect diction.
Posted by: Pat | December 6, 2010 11:21 PM
"diction." haha
Posted by: Joey | December 7, 2010 07:02 PM
It's funny cuz it's got Dick in it! Just like Ninja's ass!
Posted by: pat | December 8, 2010 08:56 AM
I actually like this show.
Posted by: Ryan | December 9, 2010 01:09 AM
Dawn Of The Dead remake was decent enough, though it is exactly the movie I described in the 'jigsaw' part of my rant. The Johnny Cash bit especially.
I want to see The Muppets feature in a zombie movie. That's an angle that hasn't been covered yet, and one I'd frankly pay to see.
Pat David smiles like a rapist.
And congratulations to you all for re-injecting some much-needed homosexuality back into this place. I think Joey's review was the fingerbang this place needed.
Posted by: Part-time Ninja | December 10, 2010 04:18 AM
what are you talking about? that Johnny Cash montage is fucking awesome!
and i ain't no bullshit.
Posted by: Joey | December 14, 2010 09:25 PM
The Johnny Cash bit of DOTD was the best bit.
I remember the natchos I had at the cinema while watching that movie though were fantastic. Free extra jalapenos! Result!
Posted by: Part-time Ninja | December 17, 2010 06:34 AM